Oaxaca: Crossroads of a Continent.
Project Narrative
by George Scheper and Laraine Fletcher
I.
"Maize Has a Soul"
No aspect of the study of
the origins of civilization in the Americas has absorbed more continuous
scholarly attention than the domestication of corn, or maize, the
most productive crop ever generated by human agricultural intervention.
Corn as we know it, selectively bred from the wild grass teosinte,
and unable to reproduce itself in the wild, is wholly dependent
upon human cultivation. In turn, human life in Oaxaca, as in other
regions of Mesoamerica, has been understood for millennia to be
so dependent upon corn that in one version after another of indigenous
origin stories, people are declared to be, as the novelist Miguel
Asturias has put it, "Men of Maize"; or, as anthropologist
Alan Sandstrom titled his classic study of contemporary Nahua culture
in central Mexico, Corn is Our Blood
(1991). The multiple existential meanings of corn in contemporary
agrarian Zapotec culture are explored in "Maize Has a Soul,"
chapter four of González's Zapotec Science.
The story of corn and the numerous other cultigens utilized over
the centuries in Oaxaca is displayed in the innovative Ethnobotanical
Garden of the Regional Oaxaca Cultural Center, which will be visited
by participants.
The subsequent development
of Mesoamerican civilization depended upon the domestication of
corn. Following Mangelsdorf's life-long studies of these origins,
a consensus today holds that this crucial intervention, one of just
half a dozen instances in global history of the primary or independent
development of agriculture, occurred seven or eight thousand years
ago in the Tehuacan Valley, between the present Mexican states of
Puebla and Oaxaca. In turn, this innovation led to the first experiments
in permanent urban settlements. Institute scholar Marcus Winter
will address the topic of agriculture and its attendant ceremonialism
in formative-era Oaxacan culture in classroom seminars as well as
in field study at San José Mogote, the earliest of the ancient urban
sites (c. 1000 BCE).
Readings for this unit will
include excerpts from Flannery and Marcus' Zapotec
Civilization (1996) as
well as other selections dealing with formative-era archaeology
of Oaxaca. In addition, the on-going importance of corn-based culture,
"from milpa [cornfield] to tortilla," in modern times is addressed
in assigned readings from Roberto González's previously mentioned
Zapotec Science, which
shows how contemporary agricultural practices of the Zapotec region
represent a creative combination of traditional and thoroughly modern
approaches, making contemporary Zapotec farming techniques more
like structural models for the future rather than "quaint survivals
from the past" (González 238).
II.
Urbanization and Primary State Formation: the Archaeological Record
Hard upon the development
of an agricultural way of life, came the shift to permanent urban
settlements with monumental ceremonial precincts, and, once again,
archaeological evidence points to Oaxaca as the site of early urbanization
and primary state formation. While the Olmec have often been credited
with being the "mother culture" of Mesoamerica, more recent
evidence, such as the dating and provenience of formative-era pottery,
increasingly points toward what Flannery and Marcus have called
the "sister culture" concept (see John
Noble Wilford, NYT: March 15, 2005, C 1,4; cf. Richard
Diehl, Science: 18 February 2005, 1055-71), according equal status of primary development
to the Zapotec culture of Oaxaca. Thus, it now appears that not
only the domestication of corn but the earliest occurrences in Mesoamerica
of urbanism, state-level polity, and the innovations of writing
and the calendar all can be documented in the Valley of Oaxaca,
notably at San José Mogote and at Monte Albán, the largest and most
dominant pre-Columbian city-state in Oaxaca from about 400 BCE to
700 CE.
Evidence and arguments for
this primacy of civilizational development in Oaxaca were presented
forty years ago in John Paddock's Ancient Oaxaca (1966) -- which drew on still earlier Mexican scholarship
-- and in Joseph Whitecotton's The Zapotecs (1977), and were subsequently substantiated by Kent
Flannery and Joyce Marcus in The Cloud People (1983) and in Zapotec Civilization (1996). Selections from the above works are included
in our Institute Readers, along with Institute scholar Marcus Winter's
Oaxaca: the Archaeological Record
(2004).
The Oaxaca region has some
of the most impressive archaeological sites in Mesoamerica. Foremost
among them is Monte Albán, which is prominently sited atop an artificially
flattened mountain top, and consists of an array of monumental structures,
including temples, palaces, tombs, ball courts, plazas and inscribed
stelae, some bearing emblems of conquest along with as yet undeciphered
glyphic inscriptions. Monte Albán encompasses several centuries
of occupation, until its demise from unknown causes in the eighth
century CE, although the site was subsequently re-occupied in later
centuries, partly by incoming Mixtec peoples, who moved into the
Oaxaca Valley from the Mixteca Alta, and who are known to have appropriated
earlier Zapotec tombs for their own burials. One of these re-used
tombs at Monte Albán, Tomb 7, excavated by Alfonso Caso in the 1930's,
yielded what is to date still the richest excavation in North American
archaeology: a spectacular trove of Mixtec gold artifacts of the
most exquisite workmanship, now displayed in the Regional Museum
of Oaxaca in the former convent of Santo Domingo
Another major Oaxacan archaeological
site that our project will study and visit is Mitla, whose highly
distinctive aesthetic is based on the masterful use of inset facing-stone
mosaic work in palatial ground level buildings completely different
from the pyramid-platform architecture of Monte Albán Mitla. is
usually interpreted as a later Zapotec religious center, which flourished
after the waning of Monte Albán around 750 CE. But Mitla is also
associated with the Mixtec migrations of the 14th century, a population
movement that was still in process at the time of the arrival of
the Spanish. In-migrating Mixtec lords are known to have inter-married
with the local Zapotec, thus producing the somewhat mixed indigenous
culture we see in the Valley of Oaxaca today. Nevertheless, in consequence
of the pressures from the Mixtec migrations, the center of gravity
of Zapotec culture moved in historic times from the Oaxaca Valley
south and east to the Isthmus of Tehuantepec, which remains to this
day the locus of Zapotec cultural revival in the State of Oaxaca.
Impressive monumental sites
such as Monte Albán and Mitla readily capture our attention, but
it is also important to take note of the cultural information embedded
in the more modest residential sites in the Oaxaca Valley, many
of which have yielded tombs rich in artifacts such as terra cotta
incensarios of deities and deified ancestors and, in many cases,
rich mural paintings. These murals have been documented and analyzed
by Arthur Miller in The Painted Tombs of Oaxaca, Mexico/
Living with the Dead (1995), raises interpretive questions about their implications
for understanding pre-Columbian Oaxacan attitudes toward the dead,
and about possible continuities in contemporary indigenous Oaxacan
rituals and festivals for the dead. Anthropologist Ben Feinberg's
Institute seminars, based on his book The
Devil's Book of Culture: Mushrooms, Caves, and History in
the Sierra Mazateca. (Austin:
University of Texas Press, 2003), will explore cultural continuities
involving attitudes towards death, the natural world, and spiritual
power.
Another aspect of archaeology
in Oaxaca is site-management, and the relation of archaeological
priorities to the perceived needs of tourists and of the local populations
who are next-door neighbors to the sites. Nelly Robles Garc’a's
"The Monte Alban Management Plan" (SAA Archaeological
Record [2005]) analyzes the site management policies of INAH,
the national institutional authority for historical/cultural patrimony
of the Mexican government, and of the major regional archaeological
site authorities, such as the Santo Domingo Cultural Center, in
comparison with Oaxaca's distinctive indigenous-governed communitarian
museums. These diverse policies provide rich material for the discussion
of cultural policy and of museological practice -- topics that have
been given a fresh global impetus by the innovative policies of
the recently opened Smithsonian Museum of the American Indian on
the Mall in Washington.
III.
Writing and Cultural History
To the innovations of agriculture,
urbanization and primary state formation, we also need to add writing
and the calendar to the "firsts" of Oaxaca. Precise evidence
for the earliest examples of writing in the New World changes frequently
with new discoveries. For example, the ten-glyph Maya inscription
discovered just last year at San Bartolo in Guatemala dates to about
300 BCE, pushing Maya writing back a couple of hundred years earlier
than previously known (see John Noble Wilford, NYT
January 10, 2006, D3). Nevertheless, the earliest evidences of writing
and calendric notation in the New World still clearly point not
to the Maya but to still-undecipherable Zapotec, Isthmian and Olmec
texts dating even earlier in the first millennium BCE. And while
the Maya famously showed more commitment to the production of written
texts in the Classic era (c. 200- 900 CE) than did the innovating
Zapotecs, writing traditions not only continued to flourish in Oaxaca,
but ultimately gave rise to an extraordinary body of illustrated
screen-fold codices by the Mixtec people, in the Post-Classic era
in the centuries immediately preceding the arrival of the Spanish.
As there are no known surviving pre-Columbian Aztec books, these
Mixtec codices are all the more precious in giving us a glimpse
into what indigenous writing in central Mexico looked like, in the
centuries after the Maya had long ceased using their own very different
glyphic writing system in southern Mexico and Central America.
As Elizabeth Boone has shown
in Stories in Red and Black: Pictorial Histories of the Aztecs
and Mixtecs (2000), these pre-Columbian
Mixtec manuscripts represent two very different genres: books of
calendric divination (such as the Borgia group, including the Codices
Borgia, Cospi, Fejervary-Mayer, Laud and Vaticanus B), and historic/
descriptive annals (such as the Selden, Bodley and Nuttall Codices.
These latter historical codices offer amazingly detailed accounts
of the lives and deeds of named historical characters, including
such 11th century Mixtec royal personages as the princely conqueror
Lord Eight Deer, or the warrior princess Lady Six Monkey, who successfully
defended her right to succeed her father to the throne of Jaltepec.
Amazingly, as John Pohl has pointed out, at the time of the arrival
of the Spanish in 1521, "every noble house claimed descent
from the epic heroes Lord Eight Deer, Lady Six Monkey, and Lord
Eleven Wind.Ó (Pohl 2002:21).
Institute scholar John M.
D. Pohl, co-author of In the Realm of 8 Deer: the Archaeology
of the Mixtec Codices, will
offer workshop-seminars on the reading of these Mixtec codices,
in the context of on-site field study in the Mixteca Alta region,
in the actual locale of these codex narratives. During this unit,
Pohl will work in collaboration with ethnographer John Monaghan,
an authority on colonial and contemporary Mixtec society, and author
of The Covenants with Earth and Rain (1995). Thus, in this joint, interdisciplinary unit
of the Institute -- on-site "in the realm of 8 Deer" --
Pohl and Monaghan will provide the opportunity for participants
to engage with both archaic, colonial and contemporary Mixtec cultural
forms and traditions.
IV.
Cultural Continuities and Contemporary Cultural Renaissances
Just as there are contemporary
cultural continuities in the matters of indigenous Oaxacan agriculture,
and household and village social organization, so in the matter
of oral and written literary tradition, there are manifest continuities
in contemporary Mixtec and Zapotec writing and story-telling. The
final unit of the Institute will focus on contemporary indigenous
cultural and social issues in Oaxaca, including encounters with
local writers and community representatives, as facilitated by Institute
scholars Selma Holo, Lynn Stephen, Howard Campbell and Jeffrey Cohen.
Mixtec literary tradition,
for example, continued into the colonial period with documents,
such as the Codex Yanhuitlan, which preserved local community history
and tradition. Such continuities are documented in detail by Kevin
Terraciano in The Mixtecs of Colonial Oaxaca
(2001) and by Ronald Spores in The Mixtecs in Ancient
and Colonial Times (1984). Mixtec cultural expression is supported today
in publications such as the journal Tu'un Savi/ Palabra
de la Lluvia: Historia y Cultura de la Nacion Mixteca, published by the Asociaci—n Cultural Mixteca. In the Spring of 2001
the Universidad Tecnol—gico de la Mixteca organized a conference
to celebrate and promote Mixtec literature and culture, and published
the proceedings in the volume Presencias de la Cultura
Mixteca, (2004), including articles on language, popular culture, migration,
and religion ("Los s’mbolos en la cosmovisi—n de
los mixtecos").
Institute scholars Lynn Stephen
and Howard Campbell have devoted much of their careers to documenting
and supporting Zapotec cultural production. Stephen, author of
Zapotec Women: Gender, Class, and Ethnicity in Globalized Oaxaca. (2005), will focus on the cultural/economic story of
the women of Teotitlán del Valle, a town that has become renowned
for its entrepreneurial development of a weaving industry that has
gained international renown. Stephen's seminars and study visit
to Teotitlán will explore the social setting of the community, and
analyze how ethnicity, class and gender are played out in the context
of the town's weaving industry, with an emphasis on how women's
participation in ritual and fiesta has opened new socio-political
spaces (Stephen's work was featured in Smithsonian magazine ["Dream Weavers," November 2003]).
Participants will also read and discuss an important essay on the
current craft scene in Oaxaca, "Crossing Indelicate Lines:
Artisanry in Oaxaca," which appears as chapter five in Institute
scholar Selma Holo's book Oaxaca at the Crossroads.
Howard Campbell will conduct
a four-day field study to the town of Juchitán in the Isthmus of
Tehuantepec, the center of the contemporary Zapotec cultural movement.
Campbell has for many years worked with writers and other intellectuals
involved in the powerful cultural movement COCEI (the Worker-Peasant-Student
Coalition of the Isthmus of Tehuantepec), based in Juchitán, and
has documented the movement's history in Zapotec Renaissance:
Ethnic Politics and Cultural Revivalism in Southern Mexico
(1994). A companion volume that Campbell co-edited with Leigh Binford,
Miguel Bartolomé and Alicia Barabas, Zapotec Struggles:
Histories, Politics, and Representations from Juchitán, Oaxaca
(1993), is an anthology bringing together the voices of Zapotec
poets and intellectuals, along with commentaries by academics from
the U.S. and Mexico. In addition to presenting seminars in Juchitán
on the topic of the modern Zapotec renaissance, Campbell will also
bring together for the Institute roundtables of contemporary Zapotec
writers, including such figures as poet Natalia Toledo; poet and
essayist Manuel Matus (former director of the Casa de la Cultura
of Juchitán); and Victor de la Cruz (editor of the Zapotec literary
journal Guchachi' Reza
[Sliced Iguana] and author of many volumes of poetry and writings
on Zapotec history).
Participants will have ample
selections of these writers in English translation in Zapotec
Struggles, including translations
of the poetry by the noted poet and translator Nathaniel Tarn. In
addition, the Institute Reader will include selections from Beverly
Chi–as' The Isthmus Zapotecs: Women's Roles in Cultural
Context (1973) and Laura Nader's Harmony Ideology/ Justice and Control
in a Zapotec Mountain Village
(1990).
Finally, Institute scholar
Jeffrey Cohen (anthropology, Ohio State University) will address
contemporary social and economic issues in Oaxaca, and global issues
impacting Oaxaca in the 21st century in a pair of seminars on "Cooperation
and community in the town of Santa Ana del Valle" and "
OaxaCalifornia: labor issues, migration and cross-border experiences
of the Oaxaque–o diaspora." In addition to a seminar based
on his book Cooperation and Community/ Economy and Society in
Oaxaca (1999), exploring institutions
of household economy and community cooperation and reciprocity (in
the traditional forms of guelaguetza and compadrazgo), Cohen will lead a visit to the town of Santa Ana for discussion of
how these communitarian traditions stand at the present time.
In his second seminar Cohen
will explore the dynamics of Oaxacan migration, particularly to
the U.S., in the era of globalization. As Cohen has recently put
it in The Culture of Migration in Southern Mexico
(2004), "Oaxaca is not an isolated place. It is not a timeless
world where Indians follow ancient rituals and calendars. Rather,
Oaxaca is part of the growing global capitalist system linked through
tourism, development, education, entertainment, and migration."
It is a subject addressed in a recent exhibition in Paris curated
by Yvon Le Bot, with a catalogue of the same title, Chiapas>Mexico>California:
un monde fait de tous les mondes
(2002), and also is the subject of the film Oaxacalifornia, by David Bola–os, which will be screened for participant
discussion during the Institute.
Epilogue:
The City of Oaxaca as a Cultural Crossroads
The capital city of Oaxaca
is independently renowned as a tourist destination and Spanish language-learning
center, known for its fine climate, distinctive cuisine, colorful
ethnic festivals, such as Guelaguetza (a ceremony of reciprocity now celebrated as a summer folk-dance festival),
and for its contemporary art scene and its world-heritage ensemble
of colonial architecture and urban design. A history of the city
is available in Margarita Dalton's Breve historia de Oaxaca (El Colegio de México, 2004); and the city's cultural
patrimony is summarized in Carlos Velasco Perez' Oaxaca:
Patrimonio Cultural de la Humanidad
(Oaxaca, 1999). So much international connoisseur attention, and
so much internal cultural renaissance, has focused upon this magnificently
preserved colonial capital that the "Santa Fe-ization"
of the city has itself become the object of academic study, as evidenced
in the recent study by Institute scholar Selma Holo, Oaxaca
at the Crossroads: Managing Memory, Negotiating Change
((2004). Holo focuses on the involvement of local Oaxaque–os, such
as artists Francisco Toldeo and Rufino Tamayo, who have most contributed
to this cultural renaissance, and to strategies, such as weaving
co-ops and communitarian museums, for involving and investing local
indigenous communities in the economic benefits of art-related and
student-oriented cultural tourism.